What is E141? – Complete guide to understanding Copper Chlorophylls/Chlorophyllins – the stabilized synthetic green food colorant

What is E141?

Complete guide to understanding E141 (Copper Chlorophylls/Chlorophyllins) – the stabilized synthetic green food colorant

The Quick Answer

E141 is a copper complex of chlorophyll or chlorophyllin—a green pigment created by replacing the magnesium atom in natural chlorophyll (E140) with a copper atom to improve color stability. This creates a synthetic compound that is more stable against heat, light, and acidic conditions than natural chlorophyll, making it more practical for food processing. E141 comes in two main forms: E141(i) copper complexes of chlorophylls (oil-soluble) and E141(ii) copper complexes of chlorophyllins (water-soluble).

E141 is extracted from plant sources (grass, alfalfa, nettles) through chlorophyll extraction, then chemically modified by replacing magnesium with copper. It’s used as a bright green food coloring in beverages, dairy products, confectionery, canned vegetables, and sauces. Unlike natural chlorophyll (E140), E141 provides superior color brightness and heat/light stability.

E141 is EU-authorized and FDA-approved as a food coloring with an Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) of 0-15 mg/kg body weight. However, the EFSA flagged in 2015 that limited toxicological data exists for copper chlorophyllins specifically, and recommended further safety studies. The copper in E141 is bound and released minimally during processing—not reaching toxic levels. It is generally considered safe for consumption within regulated limits, though some authorities recommend caution and monitoring.

📌 Quick Facts

  • Type: Copper complex of natural chlorophyll; synthetic derivative with copper substitution
  • Also known as: Copper chlorophyll, copper chlorophyllin, copper phaeophytin, natural green 3
  • Chemical basis: Derived from E140 (chlorophyll) with magnesium atom replaced by copper atom
  • E141 subtypes: E141(i) copper phaeophytins (oil-soluble), E141(ii) sodium/potassium copper chlorophyllin salts (water-soluble)
  • CI numbers: E141(i) = CI 75810; E141(ii) = CI 75815
  • Source: Plant-derived chlorophyll extract (grass, alfalfa, nettles) chemically modified with copper
  • Primary food uses: Green food colorant; bright, stable color in beverages, dairy, confectionery
  • Safety: EU-authorized, FDA-approved, generally considered safe within limits; EFSA noted limited toxicological data
  • Physical form: Green to dark green powder or liquid depending on solubility type
  • Color provided: Bright green to blue-green; more vibrant than natural chlorophyll
  • Key properties: Synthetic green pigment, heat-stable, light-stable, acid-stable, water or oil soluble
  • Solubility advantage: E141(i) oil-soluble, E141(ii) water-soluble; allows use in wider range of products than E140
  • Chemical structure: Chlorophyll/chlorophyllin with central magnesium replaced by copper (Cu²⁺)
  • Copper content: Contains copper as integral part of molecule; firmly bound and unlikely to be harmful at food use levels
  • Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI): 0–15 mg/kg body weight
  • Maximum inclusion level: ~100 mg/kg in foods (varies by product category)
  • Dietary restrictions: Depends on interpretation; synthetic modification means not considered vegan by strict standards
  • Classification: Semi-synthetic (derived from natural chlorophyll but chemically modified)
  • Difference from E140: Superior stability to heat, light, and acids vs. natural chlorophyll
  • Copper concerns: Copper released when E141 heated; however, concentrations from food use do not reach toxic levels
  • EFSA 2015 reassessment: Noted some components of copper chlorophyllins can be absorbed and distributed systemically; recommended further safety studies
  • Data gaps: EFSA noted limited available data on ADME, genotoxicity, chronic toxicity, carcinogenicity for copper chlorophyllins

What Exactly Is It?

E141 is a semi-synthetic pigment created by taking natural chlorophyll (E140)—which contains a central magnesium atom—and replacing that magnesium with a copper atom (Cu²⁺). This simple but profound chemical modification creates a compound that is more stable and vibrant than natural chlorophyll while maintaining the same basic porphyrin ring structure.

Think of E141 as “souped-up chlorophyll.” Natural chlorophyll is the green pigment that drives photosynthesis in plants. However, natural chlorophyll is unstable—it degrades when exposed to heat, light, and acids, and its color can be dull in processed foods. By swapping the magnesium atom for copper, the resulting compound becomes remarkably stable and produces a brighter green color—making it ideal for food manufacturing.

See also  What is E243? - Complete guide to understanding Ethyl Lauroyl Arginate

Key characteristic: E141 is semi-synthetic—derived from natural plant sources but chemically modified. This distinguishes it from fully synthetic dyes and from natural chlorophyll (E140). It’s more stable than E140, making it more practical for processed foods, but requires more processing than simply extracting and purifying natural chlorophyll.

Chemical identity:

Parent compound: Chlorophyll (E140) with central Mg²⁺ atom
Modified form: Copper complex with central Cu²⁺ atom substituting Mg²⁺
E141(i): Copper phaeophytins; oil-soluble form; C₃₄H₃₄CuN₄O (approximate formula)
E141(ii): Sodium or potassium salts of copper chlorophyllin; water-soluble form
Porphyrin ring: Four nitrogen-containing rings forming square-planar geometry around central copper
Chemical class: Metalloporphyrin (porphyrin with metal center)
Copper binding: Copper firmly bound in porphyrin ring structure; tightly coordinated

How it’s made:

E141 is produced from natural chlorophyll through extraction and chemical modification:

Plant source: Chlorophyll extracted from green plants (grass, alfalfa, nettles, spinach)
Extraction method: Solvent extraction of plant material; chlorophyll separated from other compounds
Saponification (for E141ii): Alkaline hydrolysis of chlorophyll to form chlorophyllin (magnesium removed)
Copper addition: Organic copper salt added to chlorophyll or chlorophyllin extract
Metal exchange: Copper ions replace magnesium atoms in porphyrin ring (ligand exchange reaction)
Crystallization: Copper-modified product crystallizes or precipitates
Salt formation (for E141ii): Product converted to sodium or potassium salt for water solubility
Purification: Final product refined to food-grade specifications

Semi-synthetic classification: E141 is not naturally occurring—it doesn’t exist in nature. However, it’s derived from natural chlorophyll extracted from plants, so it’s not entirely synthetic like some dyes. This places it in a middle category: natural source material with synthetic chemical modification.

E141(i) vs E141(ii)

Type Chemical Name Solubility Form Primary Uses Production
E141(i) Copper phaeophytins Oil-soluble (lipophilic) Usually liquid or paste Oil-based foods, shortenings, fat-soluble products Direct copper complexation of chlorophyll
E141(ii) Copper chlorophyllin (sodium/potassium salts) Water-soluble (hydrophilic) Powder or aqueous solution Beverages, dairy, aqueous products, wide range of foods Saponification of chlorophyll + copper + salt formation

Key difference: E141(i) is for oil-based products; E141(ii) is water-soluble and has much wider food application, making it the more commonly used form.

Where You’ll Find It

E141 appears in foods where bright, stable green coloring is needed:

Primary Food Applications:

Beverages (MAJOR USE) – soft drinks, fruit juices, herbal drinks, plant-based milks, sports drinks; bright green color
Dairy products (MAJOR USE) – ice cream, yogurt, ice lollies, desserts; stable green color
Confectionery (MAJOR USE)candies, jellies, gum, sweets, mint-based products; vibrant green
Canned vegetables – peas, green beans; restores and enhances natural green color lost in processing
Sauces and condiments – mint sauce, green sauces, pickles, preserves
Baked goods – cake decorations, icings, color in baked products
Pasta – spinach-colored pasta where color enhancement needed
Soups – green soups, broths; color stability
Alcoholic beverages – liqueurs, herbal drinks
Pharmaceutical products – green tablets, capsules, medicinal liquids

Regulatory scope: EU Authorization—E141 approved under Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008; permitted in many food categories. FDA—Chlorophyllin copper complexes approved for specific uses in US; mainly in coloring citrus-based dry beverage mixes and certain limited categories.

Primary food applications: E141 is most extensively used in beverages (where water-solubility and heat-stability are important) and canned vegetables (where it restores green color lost in processing while being more stable than natural chlorophyll).

💡 Pro Tip: Check labels on green-colored beverages, ice cream, candies, and canned vegetables for “E141,” “E141(i),” “E141(ii),” “copper chlorophyll,” “copper chlorophyllin,” or “natural green 3.” Because E141 is more stable than natural chlorophyll (E140), products using E141 maintain brighter green color during shelf storage and after heat processing. Many manufacturers use E141 specifically for its superior color stability and brightness compared to alternatives.

E141 vs E140 (Chlorophyll)

Characteristic E140 (Chlorophyll) E141 (Copper Chlorophyll)
Origin Natural; directly extracted from plants Semi-synthetic; derived from E140 with chemical modification
Central atom Magnesium (Mg²⁺) Copper (Cu²⁺)
Heat stability Degrades with heat Very stable at high temperatures
Light stability Fades with light exposure Resistant to light degradation
Acid stability Degrades in acidic conditions Stable in acidic foods
Color brightness Duller green Brighter, more vibrant green
Solubility options Limited options; less versatile Available in oil-soluble (i) and water-soluble (ii) forms
Food applications Limited to products not exposed to heat/light Wider range; suitable for processed foods
Safety concerns Excellent safety record; extensive data Generally safe; EFSA flagged data gaps requiring further studies
See also  What is E474? - Complete guide to understanding Sucroglycerides in your food

Why Do Food Companies Use It?

E141’s primary advantage over natural chlorophyll (E140) is superior stability and color brightness, making it ideal for processed foods exposed to heat, light, and acids.

Food manufacturers use copper chlorophylls for multiple strategic advantages:

Heat stability: Colors remain bright even after processing, cooking, or pasteurization
Light stability: Color doesn’t fade during shelf storage under store lighting
Acid stability: Maintains color in acidic beverages and foods
Bright color: More vibrant green than natural chlorophyll; better visual appeal
Versatility: Available in oil-soluble and water-soluble forms for different applications
Cost efficiency: More economical than some alternatives for achieving stable green color
Processing flexibility: Can be used in products that undergo heat treatment (unlike E140)
Regulatory acceptance: EU and FDA approved; recognized globally as safe
Natural origin perception: Derived from plant sources; appeals to “natural” positioning
No flavor impact: Doesn’t affect taste or aroma
Replacement for synthetic dyes: Seen as preferable to synthetic green dyes by consumers
Canned vegetables: Replaces/restores color lost during heat processing

Unique advantage: E141 is essentially “E140 improved”—the same natural chlorophyll base but chemically optimized for food manufacturing where stability is critical.

Is It Safe?

E141 is generally considered safe at food use levels by regulatory authorities; however, the EFSA flagged in 2015 that additional toxicological data would be valuable.

Regulatory approval:

EU authorization: E141 approved as food colorant under Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008
FDA status (US): Chlorophyllin copper complexes approved for specific uses; recognized as safe
JECFA status: Recognized as safe with ADI of 0-15 mg/kg body weight
EFSA evaluation (2015): Re-evaluated and approved; however, noted data gaps

Safety profile (based on current evidence):

No acute toxicity: No documented toxicity at food use levels
No chronic toxicity: Limited long-term studies but no documented harm
No adverse effects: No documented adverse health effects documented at approved levels
Not genotoxic: No evidence of genetic damage
Copper binding: Copper firmly bound in porphyrin ring; minimally released during normal food use
Minimal copper release: When heated, copper releases; however, amounts are well below toxic thresholds
Copper exposure: Total copper contribution from food use is minimal compared to other dietary sources
ADI established: 0-15 mg/kg body weight; protective margin applied
Multiple regulatory approvals: Recognized as safe by EU, FDA, JECFA, and other authorities
Safe for children: Permitted in foods for children within specified limits
Generally well-tolerated: No documented adverse effects at food use levels

Noted concerns and data gaps (from EFSA 2015 re-evaluation):

Limited toxicological studies: Very few studies conducted using copper chlorophylls/chlorophyllins
Absorption potential: EFSA noted that some components of copper chlorophyllins can be absorbed and distributed systemically (unlike E140 which is poorly absorbed)
Carcinogenicity uncertainty: EFSA noted discrepancies and uncertainties in available data concerning carcinogenic potential; recommended further evaluation
ADME data gaps: Limited data on absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion
Chronic toxicity studies needed: Recommended additional long-term toxicity studies
Definition/identity concerns: EFSA noted products on market vary in composition; standardization/definition improvement needed
Call for data: EU issued formal call for scientific data on copper chlorophylls/chlorophyllins in 2024 to address data gaps

⚠️ Safety Note: While E141 is currently approved and considered safe for use within regulated limits, the EFSA in 2015 identified that more comprehensive toxicological data would be valuable to fully characterize safety profile. The main concerns were: (1) limited number of toxicological studies available, (2) potential systemic absorption of some components (unlike natural E140), and (3) uncertainties regarding carcinogenic potential requiring further evaluation. For this reason, while E141 remains approved, some sources recommend monitoring and caution, particularly regarding long-term consumption or in sensitive populations. The regulatory agencies continue to collect data, and standards may evolve as additional research becomes available.

Comparison: E141 vs Natural Chlorophyll vs Synthetic Dyes

Colorant Type Heat Stability Light Stability Safety Profile Common Use
E140 (Chlorophyll) Natural Poor Poor Excellent; extensive data Fresh/unprocessed foods
E141 (Cu-Chlorophyll) Semi-synthetic Excellent Excellent Good; some data gaps noted 2015 Processed foods, beverages
Synthetic dyes (e.g., E131, E133) Fully synthetic Excellent Excellent Varies; concerns exist for some Wide food applications
See also  What is E354? - Complete guide to understanding Calcium Tartrate in your food

The Bottom Line

E141 (copper chlorophylls/chlorophyllins) is a semi-synthetic green food colorant created by replacing the magnesium in natural chlorophyll (E140) with copper, creating a more stable and vibrant pigment than natural chlorophyll. It’s used in beverages, dairy products, confectionery, and canned vegetables where heat and light stability are important.

E141 is EU-authorized and FDA-approved with an ADI of 0-15 mg/kg body weight.

Key advantages: E141 is generally considered safe at food use levels. EU-authorized; FDA-approved; JECFA-recognized. Superior stability to heat, light, and acids compared to natural E140. Brighter, more vibrant green color. Versatile in oil-soluble and water-soluble forms.

Key limitations/concerns: The EFSA in 2015 identified data gaps, particularly regarding toxicological studies, potential systemic absorption (unlike E140), and carcinogenic potential. The EU issued a 2024 call for additional scientific data. While currently approved and considered safe within regulated limits, additional comprehensive safety studies would strengthen the evidence base. Some individuals may prefer E140 (natural chlorophyll) due to its longer safety track record and more extensive toxicological database.

For consumers: E141 is safe when encountered in food products at approved levels. The copper is bound within the molecule and released minimally during normal food use—not reaching toxic levels. However, if you prefer colorants with more extensive toxicological data, E140 (natural chlorophyll) represents an alternative. Most regulatory authorities consider E141 safe based on available evidence, though continued data collection and monitoring may refine understanding of long-term safety profile.

Primary application: E141 is iconic in beverages and canned vegetables where its superior stability (vs. E140) is essential for maintaining bright green color through processing, storage, and shelf-life.

Regulatory trajectory: E141 remains approved and widely used, but the regulatory stance reflects appropriate caution: approved for safe use within limits, while acknowledging that additional toxicological data would strengthen the safety assessment. This is a reasonable regulatory posture for a semi-synthetic compound where extended research could provide additional reassurance.

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *